N0ZYC  : owell.  whatever.  I think the bot is wrong on the resistivity of #10 copper
N0ZYC  : I just measured my only piece of #10 OFC that's reasonably long and it's about 0.00162  ohms per foot.  which is a lot less than the .01 the bot is claiming
kludge : N0ZYC: What did it say?
N0ZYC  : it said 1 milli ohm per foot for #10
kludge : And in what units?
N0ZYC  : "mOhm"
N0ZYC  : so uless m is miro
kludge : Just a sec, let me get the ITT Handbook.
N0ZYC  : uOhm should be for micro
N0ZYC  : I don't have a second length of it to do my subtraction on , but the 4 wire measure got me 0.00162 ohms per foot
N0ZYC  : that will include the connectors on both ends as well as the shorting stub
kludge : Okay, annealled copper (non OFC) is 0.9989 ohms per thousand feet at 68F.
N0ZYC  : per THOUSAND.  not per HUNDRED
kludge : I remember the rule #10 - 1 - 1000.
N0ZYC  : !wire 10
N0ZYC  : owell, cached    10AWG (12.2SWG, 5.26mm2, 2.59mm dia, 101.9 mils) Cu Wire Free air: 57.48A, Bundled: 33.82A, Windings: 14.83A, mOhm/Ft: 1, mOhm/m: 3.28
N0ZYC  : " mOhm/Ft: 1,"
N0ZYC  : bzzzt
kludge : My number is from the ITT Handbook which I trust more than software.  Maybe you should talk to whoever is responsible for the bot.
N0ZYC  : the bot's resistivity is apparently off by a factor of 10